ADVANCEDINDEX SEARCH
Search Site
alive Academy
Alive Forum
Event Calendar
Health Retailers Search
Alive Awards
Alive Web Exclusives
Alive Australia


APEX Awards 2007
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Deodorant Vs. Antiperspirant Please Advise

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.alive.com Forum Index -> Readers' Stories
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 8:37 pm    Post subject: Deodorant Vs. Antiperspirant Please Advise Reply with quote

This post is for my wife.
I was told quite some time ago that antiperspirant clogs your pores and can even lead to cancer. I myself use deodorant, but my wife uses antiperspirant. Should I be worried. I know she will switch to deodorant only if I ask her to, but when her and I looked at the store every single woman's deodorant was also a antiperspirant. Can somone please tell where to find a brand name reliable deodorant for my wife. I would really appreciate it.


Last edited by Guest on Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:41 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
hana
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 1:14 am    Post subject: deodorant Reply with quote

Hi
Both the pabas, parabans and aluminium in normal anti-perspirants can cause cancer so you're right and she should probably stop using them.
But, Natures Gate Beauty makes some great all-natural deodorants that actually work really well and they're available and most chemists or health shops. :D
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you
Back to top
Guest
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:00 am    Post subject: FALSE CLAIMS Reply with quote

This 'cancer' in which is supposedly caused by antiperspirant is a FALSE claim taken over by people who do understand science. If antiperspirant causes cancer, then why haven't we all got it? We've all used antiperspirant for donkey's years, and quite frankly, common sense dictates that cancer would be caused in everyone in whom used products such as antiperspirant.

Also, here are a few other reasons in which clarify that the claims of antiperspirant causing cancer is false:

* There are plenty of other areas where you can still sweat: your scalp, your face, the front of your neck and down along the cleavage, down your back, in your groin area, and behind the knees (think about your all-over sweat "sprinkler system" during a hot flash!).
* Why would antiperspirants affect only breast cancer risk? It doesn't increase the risk of skin cancer in the armpit, even though antiperspirant concentration is highest there. If antiperspirant is absorbed through the skin and stored in the armpit lymph nodes, then why isn't there a higher rate of lymph node cancer?
* Even if the antiperspirant were concentrated in the armpit lymph nodes, the lymphatic fluid would not drain away to the breast. The direction of lymphatic fluid flow starts in the breast, and drains out through the armpit lymph nodes, toward the neck, and back into circulation. Additionally, there are one-way valves along the lymphatic drainage channels that keep the fluid moving in one direction (AWAY from the breast, not TO the breast).
* It's not true that "nearly all breast cancers" occur in the upper outer aspect of the breast, the part closest to the armpit. Rather, 40–50% of all breast cancers occur in that region, in part because more breast tissue naturally "lives" in this area, compared to the three other quadrants of the breast: upper inner, lower outer, and lower inner.

Therefore, it is obvious that these claims are a result of rumours, which presumably was emphasised by the media. As per usual.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 9:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

well.... how come not all smokers have lung cancer....
Back to top
JoJoanie



Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

funny stuff.
although how do we know that not all smokers have lung cancer? have they all been tested?

i stopped using antiperspirant decades ago when reports were finding that exposure to aluminum increased risk of alzheimer's, as well inhibited the functions of the glands in the armpit area. don't know if any of it is true, but it turns out deodorant (sans anti-perspirant) works just fine.

I get Tom's of Maine deodorant at Trader Joe's (or your local health food store).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
krys3ty
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:46 am    Post subject: deodorant/perspiration hype Reply with quote

Hello,
I am motivated to include my two-penny worth.
The skin is the largest organ of the body and does have major healing work to do i.e getting rid of toxins. there are many products on the market which are [b]not[/b] anti-perspiring and are non-blocking. The simplicity of potasium alum for example is that the cellular size is larger than the skin cell and lies like talc. Once your perspiration has been absorbed it may not go back and rest on the skin and mix with our very normal skin bacteria and produce that very distinctive smell.
This issue is about consumer choice, my attitude is walk away from all the hype..................... and find simple answers.
I must declare that i am marketing alum crystals on www.pure-natural-deodorant.com Plese feel free to have a look around.
:D
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.alive.com Forum Index -> Readers' Stories All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum