|
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
by author Pat Bennett Water is a public trust and a basic human right. We cannot live without it. Like air, water should never be considered “goods” to be traded and sold on the world market; yet the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has left our water wide open to exploitation. Canada’s water is in crisis. The federal government promised our water would be protected under trade deals it might sign. Bureaucrats have spent much time and money trying to reassure us that we have nothing to be concerned about. Under the General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade (GATT), this was true. However, when the GATT was superceded by NAFTA, the federal government in effect yielded control of our country’s water to the United States under National Treatment (Chapter 11). Americans are now given the same rights to our water as Canadians. This agreement cancels our right to tax our water exports to the US, overrides the constitutional right of the provinces to control the water within their boundaries and gives US corporations the right to sue the federal government if it, or a province, fails to respect the terms of the agreement. Nowhere in NAFTA is there any wording that gives Ottawa or the provinces the right to limit or embargo water exports to the US. NAFTA impacts on every right and obligation not specifically exempted from it–and there is no exemption for water. Americans are free to demand that our governments accommodate their water interests. The agreement has opened the door for Sun Belt Water Corporation of California to sue our federal government for millions of dollars of lost profit because it was not allowed to proceed with a scheme of water diversification under British Columbia’s moratorium on bulk water exports. The lawsuit was filed in December 1998 and is still under federal negotiation. But if Sun Belt wins under NAFTA, the floodgates could open. Another promise broken: another lie. “Privatization” and “globalization” have become the buzzwords of this new century. Everything is on the table. In July 2001, American president George W. Bush stated that he wanted to negotiate a continental water agreement. What the US wants, it gets. This demand ends any pretence that Canada’s water is protected from thirsty Americans. Our illustrious prime minister, Jean Chrétien, signalled to Bush that he was willing to turn on the tap by reversing his government’s opposition to bulk water exports, knowing full well that, under NAFTA, once the tap has been turned on, it can never be turned off. Enter Bill C-6, which most Canadians haven’t heard of. It gives the minister of foreign affairs the authority to grant bulk water export licenses. “Well who cares? We have plenty of water!” some people may say with a shrug. But we don’t. Much of it is now so polluted that it’s unusable. We could run out of safe water ourselves and still be forced to supply the United States and do without while they fill their swimming pools. NAFTA is a rotten deal for Canada and we should never have signed it. Prime Minister Chrétien originally stood up in Parliament and spoke firmly against the NAFTA deal–but once in power, he picked up the pen and signed immediately. Grand Farewell to Water Bill C-6 will allow the Great Recycling and Northern Development Canal Project (GRAND), a project to channel huge amounts of water from James Bay in Northern Ontario to the US, to proceed, along with other like schemes of water diversion. GRAND is the invention of mining engineer Thomas Kierans, who in 1959 proposed building a dyke across the mouth of James Bay to create a huge freshwater lake. The dyke would block seawater into the “reservoir” of James Bay by opening “outflow only” sluice gates on Hudson Bay at low tide and closing them at high tide. With the freshwater flow from the rivers pouring into James Bay, the dyked enclosure would change from a saltwater bay to a freshwater lake in about three years.
Pat Bennett is a freelance writer living in Longworth, BC. Source: alive #231, January 2002 |
||||||||||